Most people can agree that securing a job as a teenager offers valuable lessons, such as how to manage money, the importance of responsibility, and the development of a solid work ethic. These early experiences can shape a teenager’s approach to adulthood, serving not just as an economic support but also as a beacon of personal growth. They learn what it means to be consistent, reliable, and dedicated — skills they’ll carry into their futures.
However, while gaining work experience is crucial, it’s important to remember that there are federal and state labor laws designed to ensure that education remains a priority for young people. These laws exist to protect teenagers from exploitation and to prevent corporations from overstepping by taking advantage of their eagerness or need to work. They were put in place for a reason: to preserve the balance between work and school, ensuring that young people can pursue their education without being overwhelmed by job demands.
Today, as the federal government intensifies its efforts to regulate undocumented workers, many states are feeling the impact, particularly when it comes to filling hard-to-staff positions that often tend to be low-wage and unappealing—positions that have historically been filled by immigrant workers. In Florida, this predicament has led to a controversial proposition that could fundamentally change the landscape of child labor laws in the state.
Governor Ron DeSantis is lending his support to Senate Bill 918, a measure under discussion in the Florida Senate that seeks to revise these child labor laws. His perception is straightforward: in times of labor shortages, why should we rely on importing foreign workers—illegally or not—when our teenagers could potentially fill these roles? “Why do we say we need to import foreigners, even import them illegally, when you know, teenagers used to work at these resorts, college students should be able to do this stuff?” DeSantis remarked during a panel discussion on immigration. “And what’s wrong with expecting our young people to be working part-time now? I mean that’s how it used to be when I was growing up.”
If passed, this bill would permit children as young as 14 to work overnight shifts on school nights—something currently prohibited due to concerns about academic performance and overall well-being. Not only that, the bill could allow teens to clock in over 30 hours of work a week while school is in session, effectively overriding protections meant to ensure they have ample time and energy to focus on their studies. It would even eliminate the requirements for breaks during long shifts, which are essential for maintaining health and productivity.
One significant change from previous legislation was the removal of many restrictions for homeschooled or virtually-schooled teenagers last year. This shift raises questions about the long-term effects of such decisions, particularly for the well-being of those teens involved.
Nina Mast, an analyst with the Economic Policy Institute, expressed deep concern about the consequences of this bill. She highlights that “The teens who will be most harmed by this bill are low-income young people or those without documented status who are compelled by their situation to work.” It reflects a worrying trend in which the most vulnerable teens may be forced into work situations detrimental to their education and future prospects.
Research unequivocally shows that teens working more than 20 hours per week during the school year are significantly at risk of dropping out. Limiting working hours has been associated with greater academic achievement and reduced dropout rates. The more we delve into this issue, the clearer it becomes: education should be prioritized for our youth, not hustled aside for cheap labor during both school hours and nights.
As these discussions unfold, it’s imperative that we consider not only the immediate fiscal needs of local economies but also the long-term implications for our teenagers—our future workforce. Would you want your child to take on so much responsibility at such a young age, perhaps sacrificing their education and youth in the process? It’s a question many parents and guardians find themselves grappling with, especially in the face of increasing pressures on both sides of the debate.
Image Source: Magsi / Shutterstock
